Texas Supreme Court Ruling Reshapes Oil Industry Water Rights in the Permian Basin

MIDLAND, TX — In a landmark decision that could reshape oil operations across the Permian Basin, the Texas Supreme Court has ruled that ownership of “produced water” belongs to mineral rights holders, not surface landowners. Produced water—an oily, saline byproduct of fracking and oil extraction—is a costly waste stream for drillers, but increasingly a valuable resource for reuse and mineral recovery.
The decision in Cactus Water Services, LLC v. COG Operating, LLC reclassifies produced water as “oil and gas waste,” legally tying it to the mineral estate. That means oil companies—not ranchers or landowners—hold the rights to manage, dispose of, or commercialize the billions of barrels of wastewater generated each year.
🔑 Key takeaway: The ruling gives oil producers clear legal control over produced water—unlocking new revenue streams and shifting control away from landowners.
Why It Matters for the Oil Sector
- Permian oil producers generate over 1 billion barrels of produced water monthly
- The ruling opens the door for lithium extraction, water recycling, and ESG-driven innovations
- Surface owners and third-party water processors lose leverage, unless lease language says otherwise
Legal clarity now gives oil and gas companies in West Texas more power to monetize wastewater through treatment, reuse, or even direct sales—especially as demand grows for minerals like lithium found in brines.
Meanwhile, Permian Rig Count Continues to Slide
Despite legal wins, activity is slowing. The Permian rig count fell to 270 last week, the lowest since early 2022. Falling prices and tighter capital spending are driving the slowdown, particularly in the Midland and Delaware sub-basins.
Bottom Line
This court decision may be the biggest regulatory shift for Texas oil producers in years. It gives operators the green light to turn an environmental challenge into a commercial opportunity—especially in the water-stressed, lithium-rich Permian Basin.
🔗 Official court opinion: Texas Supreme Court – Case No. 23-0676